Confidence Is a Skill, Not a Personality Trait
Reflections from the first Ungatekeeping Confidence Workshop
This week I ran the first Ungatekeeping Confidence Workshop and I am still buzzing.
The premise is simple. The content I usually deliver inside law firms and in-house teams sits behind a paywall, accessible only to lawyers whose employers happen to have an L&D budget for this kind of thing.
Plenty of lawyers don’t have access to that budget, don’t work somewhere that prioritises this kind of development or are still at law school trying to work out how the profession actually functions.
Ungatekeeping means opening it up. Same content, same care but more accessible.
What we got into across the hour ended up being one of the most useful conversations I have had with a group of lawyers in a long time.
Lawyer brain is real and it is not a personal failing
I asked attendees what they were struggling with before we started and the responses were almost identical. Feelings of inadequacy, imposter syndrome, the constant low hum of negative self-talk, the way opposing counsel can make you question every word you have written.
Different cities, different practice areas, different stages of career, same internal monologue. That is not a coincidence, and it is not a character flaw. It is lawyer brain.
Lawyer brain is the habitual pattern of anxiety, perfectionism and worst-case-scenario thinking that makes you genuinely good at your job. The ability to spot what could go wrong is the entire reason clients pay you. The problem is that the same machinery that protects your clients can quietly sabotage your career when it goes unmanaged.
It shows up in identifiable ways.
The Qualifier, who softens every statement until it almost disappears. The Deflector, who cannot take a compliment without bouncing it off onto someone else. The Waiter, who is always one more course, one more year, one more milestone away from being ready. The Overpreparer, the Minimiser and the Withholder.
Most of us recognise one or two of these immediately, which was both confronting and a relief, because naming something is the first step in being able to do anything about it.
The gap between the cue and the response
The first practical move is learning to notice the physical cues. Chest tightening when you are about to send a message, the compulsion to read an email forty times before pressing send, the dread of speaking up in a meeting.
These are nervous system responses, not evidence that you are incompetent. They are old patterns running on autopilot. Once you can name what is happening in your body, you create a tiny gap between the cue and your response, and that gap is where you get to choose. Send the email or rewrite it again, speak up or stay quiet, ask the question or shrink.
You cannot always close the gap immediately, but you can widen it with practice, which is really what the rest of the workshop was about.
Confidence is not arrogance and it does not arrive in advance
One of the biggest misconceptions I see in legal circles is that confidence is the same as arrogance, or that some people just have it and others do not. Neither is true.
Confidence is self-awareness plus action. It is not a personality trait you were born with or without. It is not a feeling that arrives before you do the scary thing. It is the prize you get for doing the scary thing anyway.
Think of it like the gym. You do not walk in strong, you walk in, do the reps, walk out slightly worse, then come back and do it again. Strength is the by-product of repetition and confidence works exactly the same way.
The implication is uncomfortable but freeing. If you are waiting to feel confident before you put your hand up, ask the question, send the pitch, apply for the role or share the post, you will be waiting forever. The action comes first, the confidence follows.
Competence is expected, the performance of competence is what gets noticed
This is the part of the conversation I think every junior lawyer needs to hear.l and no one is telling them.
Being good at your job is the floor, not the ceiling. Technical competence is the baseline expectation, the thing you were hired for. It will not, on its own, get you promoted, recommended, remembered or sponsored into the next opportunity.
What does that work is visibility. Sharing what you have learned, sending the update, asking to sit in on the meeting, volunteering for the project, making your thinking legible to the people whose opinion of you actually shapes your career.
Brilliant work done in silence stays silent. That is not unfair, that is just how organisations function. Your job is to make sure the people who matter know what you are doing and how you are thinking, in a way that feels genuine to you.
Build the evidence file
The most practical tool I gave the group was the evidence file. Lawyer brain runs on a story, and the story is always some version of “you are not enough.” The way you break the story is with evidence.
Track your wins, big ones, small ones, all of them. The client who said something nice in an email, the matter you closed out well, the colleague who thanked you, the moment you spoke up when you wanted to stay quiet. Save them somewhere you can find them.
Then build a reflection practice. Mine is Friday afternoon, between 4:30 and 5:00, with a coffee and the door closed. What did I do this week that I am proud of, what did I learn, what evidence did I just generate against the voice in my head.
If you can name one or two things a week, that is compounding interest on your sense of self. Six months in, you have a different relationship with your own competence. You also have receipts for your next performance review, your CV update, your next promotion conversation or your LinkedIn post.
The other tool that came up was naming the inner critic. Give the voice a name, a real one, something silly enough to take its power away. Frank, Karen, whatever lands. The moment you can say “ah, that is Frank again” instead of mistaking the critic for your actual self, you have created the gap we talked about earlier.
Minimum Viable Product or MVP is a confidence tool
The last big idea we covered was MVP thinking, borrowed shamelessly from the start-up world and dropped into legal practice where it badly belongs.
Perfectionism, which is just lawyer brain in a fancy suit, will tell you that the only acceptable version of any new thing is the polished, complete and flawless one. That standard is what keeps lawyers paralysed and out of action for months at a time. It is also a lie, because you cannot be perfect at something you have never done before. Nobody can.
The MVP move is to dramatically lower the bar for what counts as success the first time you try something. For your first meeting with opposing counsel, success looks like showing up, taking notes, not crying openly (lol) and being honest when you do not know something and not actively making things worse. That is it, that is the bar. Repeat it ten times and you will be running the meeting.
For your first presentation, do not aim to dazzle the room, aim to land one idea with one person. The pressure drops, you relax and the irony is that you become significantly better in front of the rest of the audience too.
The first time you have to admit you got something wrong, send the email. The MVP version of owning a mistake is a written acknowledgement with the corrected position and a proposed path forward and the in-person follow-up can come after.
Done is better than perfect and direct is better than avoidant.
What I want you to take away
Three things:
One, confidence is a skill, built by doing the thing before you feel ready, not after. The reps make the muscle.
Two, your inner critic is not the same as your judgement. Name it, notice it, let it have an opinion and then do the thing anyway.
Three, your wins exist whether you write them down or not, but they only build confidence if you write them down. Start the evidence file this week and start the Friday ritual to go with it.
The next Ungatekeeping Workshop is already in the works. If there is a topic you want covered, DM me, because the whole point of this exercise is putting the materials in the hands of the lawyers who actually need them now.
In the meantime, Friday afternoon, 4:30. You, a crisp Coke Zero, ten minutes. Start there.
Mel
💖
